mike_redbotham
03-01-2011, 10:07 AM
An esoteric question to which there is probably no definitive answer.
But, who feels a spanking more, those with large buttocks or those with small ones?
Obviously, with a given number of spanks or strokes, there is a larger area to cover with large buttocks whilst they are more concentrated on small ones.
From the spankers' point of view, far more energy has to be invested to turn large buttocks a uniform red. This, of course results in a greater number of strokes but, as they are more spread out, does this result in greater discomfort for the spankee?
One also has to consider the number of nerve endings. Is there a fixed total number which are therefore more spread out on larger bums than on neat botties? Or is there a fixed number per square inch which would mean larger buttocks have a greater number. Perhaps a physician could tell us.
Interesting.
But, who feels a spanking more, those with large buttocks or those with small ones?
Obviously, with a given number of spanks or strokes, there is a larger area to cover with large buttocks whilst they are more concentrated on small ones.
From the spankers' point of view, far more energy has to be invested to turn large buttocks a uniform red. This, of course results in a greater number of strokes but, as they are more spread out, does this result in greater discomfort for the spankee?
One also has to consider the number of nerve endings. Is there a fixed total number which are therefore more spread out on larger bums than on neat botties? Or is there a fixed number per square inch which would mean larger buttocks have a greater number. Perhaps a physician could tell us.
Interesting.